Lack of
education has been seen as a major detriment to India’s development. The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory
Education Act or Right to Education Act (RTE), passed by the Indian parliament
in 2009, seeks to remedy this problem by making education a fundamental right
of all citizens of India. The act contains various provisions that prescribe
norms for ensuring education to all Indians. However a particularly
controversial provision is one that mandates a 25% reservation of seats for
children from Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in private schools. This provision has been seen as an
unreasonable imposition on private schools’ freedom and a case of the
government shifting the burden of education on to private entities. On the
other hand, the provision could lead to greater social harmony through
interaction between children from EWS and children from more privileged
sections of society. Is the compulsory
25% reservation justified? Or is it an unreasonable infringement of a private
school’s freedom?
This house will not allow reservation for students from economically weaker sections in private schools
This is a debate that will not only shape the contours of our country's future in ensuring basic education, but will fundamentally determine the viability of working out such policies within a society that is driven by socio-economic class factors from the very grassroots.
Take a chance, get cracking! We wish you all the best.
Just one doubt. While setting the house, is Palestine an option?
ReplyDelete