We
are extremely pleased to bring to you the motion for the Grand Finals of
the NLS Debate Junior 2013!
Since
its entry into Indian politics one year back, the Aam Aadmi Party, led by
the charismatic Arvind Kejriwal, has garnered significant public attention
by promising to deliver a corruption-free brand of governance. The first formal
test of the public's confidence in the party - the Delhi Assembly
elections - is set to happen on December 4th 2013, which is barely a week
away. Recently, public reactions to allegations that some of the party's
candidates were corrupt provided a rare glimpse into the complex ways in which
the Indian populace perceives the political force that the party has
become.
At
the Grand Finals of the NLS Debate Junior, the two top teams of the
tournament will be asked to imagine that the following set of fictional
facts has unfolded:
The Core Committee of the Aam Aadmi Party
has come into possession of evidence that clearly demonstrates that
Kejriwal engaged in an act of corruption while serving as an officer in the
Indian Revenue Service. The Core Committee has reason to believe that it
was an isolated act of corruption on his part, and that he will never
do the same again. The Core Committee also realises that if they choose to
suppress the evidence, the incident is unlikely to ever come
to light.
In this context, the motion for the Grand Finals is:
This House, being the Core Committee of the Aam Aadmi Party, will suppress this evidence.
With
the short amount of time left till the elections, is it unreasonable for the
Aam Aadmi Party to hope to maintain control over the information, if it chooses
to release it? And would releasing the evidence amount to a blind adherence to
the principle of transparency that risks the party's potential to deliver
transparent governance as lawmakers if they win the election? On the other
hand, does the Aam Aadmi Party, unlike any other party, have a special
obligation to abhor corruption in any form? More pragmatically, could releasing
the evidence in fact strengthen the party in the electoral race?
With
these and more questions set to be explored, analysed and answered, the Grand
Finals of this edition of the NLS Debate Junior promises to be an exciting and
challenging affair.
As a note, we'd like to thank Aashay Sahay, Sayan Sanyal and Sai Siddharth for this motion's idea.
As a note, we'd like to thank Aashay Sahay, Sayan Sanyal and Sai Siddharth for this motion's idea.